I am 54 years old, and I can clearly recall things that happened when I was two.

             It seems that the gift of an eidetic[1] memory is rare, and common sense is even more rare. I like to think I am blessed abundantly with both, and consequently, I can see things that miss the notice of most people. When things don't quite make sense to me, I'm not like the majority - I want to know WHY I can't make sense of it... and the conflict - what the shrinks call "dissonance" just sits there on the mental task bar, waiting for the proverbial interrupt. 

            Such was the case with the JFK assassination that happened 2 days after my 13th birthday. I remember it like it was yesterday. Years later, I was in the US Air Force, working in Intelligence Communications with a Top Secret clearance. I was in Vietnam in 1970-71, and worked in the Crypto vault on Tan Son Nhut, Saigon. I was also involved with the MEDCAP program as an armed escort for the medical teams.

             What I saw and was made part of by virtue of the fact that I was in the military, caused me to become entirely repulsed by things military - I had no intention of reenlisting, even though I was made an offer that some might say I had to be insane to refuse.

             Twenty eight years later, after a successful career with IBM, and after I built a million dollar GPS navigation system business, I encounter the Devil himself who was disguised as an angel - a long story --- and that was the system interrupt that brought the task running in the background into a higher processing priority. I went to PTSD therapy, and I began to write down whatever came to mind of that year I spent in the "Land Of Childhood's Fears". I was also, now in a position to be able to speak with hundreds of other vets, some of whom who would corroborate with me in an attempt to solve the world's most complex murder mystery - the assassination of John F. Kennedy. 

            A small group of us met regularly to discuss various issues, and several of these meetings focused almost entirely on JFK. 

            People are under the mistaken notion that given enough time; things get better without any effort. "Time heals all wounds", they say. Well, tell that to a man with a toothache!

             The government that is supposed to be subservient to the people lied about what happened to JFK. They lied about the Bay of Pigs, they lied about the Gulf of Tonkin incident, they lied about Air America, they lied about Operation Phoenix, they lied about Watergate, they lied about Agent Orange, they lied about Waco, they lied about Ruby Ridge, they lied about Oklahoma City, they lied about Mena Airport, they lied about Vincent Foster, they lied about the terrorist attacks on 9-11, they lied about the WMDs in Iraq, they lied about Gulf War Syndrome, and depleted uranium bullets, and they lied about just about everything else, except what was blatantly obvious and could not be denied. George Orwell was a prophet!

             In any event, the group of vets met regularly in 1999 and 2000, and we attempted to put all of the lies in context with a scenario that would explain them all.

             It is a lengthy analysis, to be sure, but I was fortunate to have in that group, a "ready writer", or shorthand scribe. Everything was written down verbatim. What we came up with was a completely believable scenario that explains what happened that day, without resorting to magic bullets fired from piece-of-shit Italian military surplus bolt-action rifles from impossible ranges, and at impossible rates.

            Our scenario does not require pristine bullets that "fall out" of dead bodies, and it doesn't require that an innocent defendant be murdered on live national TV in front of God and everybody before he is arraigned in court. Our scenario explains why over 100 material witnesses disappeared or met untimely deaths, and it explains why autopsy photos have to be kept secret over 40 years later.

             It is well known among people in the Intelligence community, that this type of operation has the paw marks of the CIA all over it. What do we propose as a motive for our own government to carry out the assassination of an American president? Hundreds of billions, if not trillions of dollars in drugs - shipped 99% pure directly from "The Golden Triangle" aboard military transport planes (Air America was a decoy operation). Some of those drugs are probably still in CIA storage facilities to this day, and being processed and distributed for sale.

             The furthest thing from the American people's minds these days is JFK... or Vietnam for that matter, but it shouldn't be. Oliver Stone stirred up some controversy for a while, but it quickly subsided after his movie "JFK" was no longer in the theaters. For all we know, that movie could have been a decoy - designed to keep the old theories alive. Disguised as an in-the-government's-face documentary, it raised the controversy, but it did not explore another possible scenario that is so obvious -- it's like someone looking for their eyeglasses when they're wearing them... ever done that? Ever done something similar?

             The question is that if Lee Harvey Oswald did not kill JFK, then who did? A more salient question would be to ask why the government is not still actively pursuing the case... obviously, it is still "hot" enough to justify keeping relevant evidence classified! Who are they hiding these facts from? Lee Oswald? I don't think so! I think that it is obvious that the government covered up what really happened. Even as apathetic as the American people are about corruption in the government, disclosure of the truth in this case would probably bring down the government in a hail of small arms fire and IEDs.[2]

             Did you ever stop long enough to ask why Timothy McVeigh was executed so quickly, or why he was so eager to die? Perhaps he wasn't executed. Perhaps he was a CIA Operative as he claimed. Perhaps many things... but one thing is for sure - the fertilizer bomb in that truck was not the only bomb. At least 6 more unexploded bombs were found inside the building - some of them apparently did explode. The same thing is probably true with the 9-11 attacks.[3] The military is guarding the Arthur Kill dumps where they took the WTC debris, perhaps not because of souvenir hunters, but perhaps someone might find a structural iron beam that was sheared by C-4 explosive. "Far fetched", you say? That's what they want you to think. "Audacity, audacity, always audacity" Robespierre said during the French Revolution. Outrageous acts are not believable, but they're true, nonetheless.

             The FBI and CIA alleged that "we couldn't connect the dots" prior to 9-11. Perhaps they couldn't CONNECT the dots, because they ARE the dots!

             At this juncture, I can offer no more empirical[4] evidence for what the group of us "ex-spooks" came up with, than the Warren Commission did when they pinned the nefarious deed on a conveniently dead man, who never got the chance to defend himself. However, our scenario is by far, more plausible than the one currently accepted, and once you read how we arrived at our conclusions, I think you will agree.

             The Warren Commission scenario violates the laws of physics, since it requires "magic bullets" that hang suspended in time. It violates the laws of physics twice, since if JFK was shot from behind as the government alleged, his head would have snapped FORWARD, not backward, and the exit wound would have blown his face onto the back of the front seat.

            The official government explanation violates the laws of ballistics, because bullets do not fall out of dead people, and they don't remain in pristine condition after crashing through a human skull. A ballistics expert who attempted to assert that bullshit story under oath would have committed career suicide and perjury. Tell me lies I can believe, but don't insult my intelligence with Sophomoric fairy tales! Spare me the bullshit, please!

             Our scenario requires none of these inexplicable leaps of faith or ill-conceived logic. Our scenario is in actuality, a wholly logical analysis, and fits within the available facts and does not require the violation of the natural laws that cannot be violated.

             For our scenario, we made only one assumption - and that assumption was that the conspirators in the plot to murder JFK had the audacity, the Chutzpah, and the cohunes to pull it off in broad daylight - in front of God and everybody, and dozens of newsreel cameras.

             I am not one to spoil an ending, and so I'll give you two options to discover for yourself, what could be so damaging about this allegation, that the author who originally albeit briefly proposed it in his book, was subsequently murdered by a police SWAT team, after alleging on his radio talk show, that Timothy McVeigh - the Oklahoma City bomber - was still breathing after he was removed from the execution chamber.

             If the reader is at all familiar with Operation Phoenix - the CIA mercenary assassination squad of the Vietnam era, then you know that political assassinations are not beneath the dignity of these types of "loose-cannon" terrorists sub nom. Your unwillingness to believe it does not make it any less the truth. The question you must ask yourself is, "When is it safe for me to rest in the sufficiency of the evidence?" If you've read my book "The Lie Detection Manual", you would realize that a lie is only told to conceal a transgression. If you catch someone in a lie, then the opposite of what you've been lied to about, is probably closer to the truth than the lie. The opposite of the lie, contrary to popular belief, is not always the truth, either.

             Since things like this type of allegation require many supporting facts, it is prohibitive to put it all here, and then having to leave the reader hanging without an impact analysis at the end. If I have piqued your interest here, and you would like to learn more, you can do one of the following:

 1)      Follow this link: http://www.lulu.com/content/89004 to download a copy of “Vet’s rap Sessions” – a verbatim transcript of the discussions between several veterans who held top security clearances and who know what they are talking about. This is an UNREDACTED and UNCENSORED verbatim transcript taken down in shorthand and translated into English. This is ONE chapter from my new book (below).

 2)      Follow this link: http://www.lulu.com/content/101852 to get a copy of “Land of Childhood’s Fears” – my book on the Vietnam War, and all of the dirty deals that came along with it. The book contains the entire text of “Vet’s Rap Sessions”, but it has been “cleaned up” for general readers (foul language has been redacted)

3)      If you are curious and do not feel like reading books, you can download the Radio Liberty interview on July 2, 2004, that discusses this topic, my book, and the Vietnam and Iraq Wars. This is a two hour program in two audio files suitable for burning onto CD follow this link è http://www.lulu.com/content/104576

4)      A digital simulation of the JFK assassination with a $100,000 reward if you can make the shot from the 6^th floor of the book depository follow this link è www.JFKReloaded.com  to get the computer demo.

My entire bookstore on the publisher’s web site is on www.LuLu.com/Net4TruthUSA/