In late August of 2012, a popular TV personality
— namely "Bill Nye The Science Guy" — re-popularized an age-old controversy:
Creation vs. Evolution. His two most-popular YouTube videos (see below) touted
the "merits" of so-called "Evolution", and like all pseudo-scientists of his
ilk, claimed that BELIEF in the Theory of Evolution is "science". I made the
mistake of joining in the "discussion", and wound up with at least three dozen
candidates for AssholesAmongUs.com
responding to my posts — Take it from me, folks.... when people
start believing in Darwin's Theory of
Evolution, they throw rational thinking
out the window. They ACTUALLY BELIEVE that this hogwash is "science" when
indeed, all it is, is religion masquerading
To start with, the guy is a MORON.... which is
good if your target audience is morons or children who are not trained in the
art of critical thinking. You see, Evolutionists want to deny what is PATENTLY
OBVIOUS — that design requires a designer. Call the designer "God" or whatever
you wish, it is OBVIOUS that all life on the planet is the product of
intelligent design, as it could not possibly exist otherwise.
Read this little book to get a laugh on the
Neither belief in God
(or a "designer") or Darwin's Theory in the full "Evolutionary" sense can be
said to be an empirical science by the following definition:
"The workability of a postulate is established by the degree to which it explains existing phenomena [which is] already known; by the degree that it predicts new phenomena which when looked for, will be found to exist, and by the degree that it does not require that phenomena which do not exist in fact, be called into existence for its explanation."
However, when both views are studied and
understood, it requires less "faith" to believe in an all-powerful intelligent
Creator who had a purpose for His creation, than to believe in the hundreds of
billions of astronomically impossible odds-against-it "accidents" that it ("must
have") taken to have the great diversity of inter-dependent and symbiotic life
we have on Planet Earth. To give you a quick example, human beings (and all
other "higher" life-forms on the planet have a variety of "gut-flora" —
organisms in the intestines — without which the digestion of food is impossible.
For either the "gut-flora" or the human being to survive, BOTH the "gut-flora"
and the human that depends on it to digest his meals, must "arrive" on the
planet simultaneously. THIS is just one of the hundreds of thousands of
conditions that just cannot be answered by the "It happened by chance" answer.
Evolutionists also fail
miserably to explain
COMPLEXITY. Although his theory has been rejected by the "scientists" —
because they cannot dispute that "Evolution" does not in any sense on non-living
"parts" or "pieces" of what is required to have a living organism that "natural selection" can work on — Irreducible Complexity completely dispels
Selection in its entirety.
To teach children this
nonsense as "science" is unforgivable; it contaminates rational thinking and
replaces critical thinking with bogus "facts". Teaching children about God
inspires faith, and that is simply what BOTH "world views" are. Let faith be
faith and science be science, but don't spin fairy tales and science fiction and
call it "fact" or "truth", or "science".
Darwin's THEORY of
Evolution is a
THEORY — a really STUPID and IGNORANT theory that has NO BASIS IN FACT
WHATSOEVER. The "scientists" who have invested the better part of their lives
studying this crap, have too much energy, time, and money invested in it to
simply give it up in the face of increasingly irrefutable, empirical science
that refutes it, and is slowly nibbling away at the "willingly
ignorant". In addition, those opposing the
Neo-Darwinist viewpoint in the
scientific community are ostracized and endanger their government grants and
their jobs by doing so — but secretly, they know better.
Peace and Godspeed -
WebPastor David Todeschini
"What is Scientology?" - L. Ron Hubbard ISBN# 1-57318-122-6 - Id at 636, Logic #19